Helices in nature: What would a F/friendly informed MIT OCW-centric philosophy of science and of STEM school (at WUaS), perhaps complementing the Stanford School of Philosophy of Science, and in many languages, with engaged, high level discussion, and many book publications, look like? :)) Generative Quaker opportunity :)

What would a F/friendly informed MIT OCW-centric philosophy of science and of STEM school (at WUaS ... http://worlduniversity.wikia.com/wiki/Philosophy_of_Science), perhaps complementing the Stanford School of Philosophy of Science, - especially vis-a-vis this conference ... http://philosophy.stanford.edu/community/events/view/1836/ ... that occurred on October 25th and October 26th on Stanford's campus - and in many or all languages, with engaged, high level discussion, and many book publications, look like? :)) Generative, {nontheistic} Quaker opportunity :)


*

Apart from nearly all panelists having taught at Stanford, what wasn't considered was both Stanford as place and its ethos, or milieu, on this school and thinking ... California thinking ... How do these aspects inform this new philosophy of science school?


*

It would probably be nontheistically friendly / atheist Quaker-informed, to start -

http://worlduniversity.wikia.com/wiki/Nontheist_Friends_(atheist_Quakers%3F) -

and the development of (and translation into and out of) the rich, philosophy of science conversation in many languages would add mind-turning aspects to the already far-reaching Stanford School -

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanford_School.


*

a wonderful, philosophy of science, technology, engineering and mathematics {STEM}, interlingual conversation

an extraordinary, wonderful philosophy of science STEM - Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics {so far broader than philosophy of science} - conversation, among philosophical, f/Friendly, human primates

...